Static linear response: theory

Let’s consider three types of static perturbations

atomic displacements ${\textstyle u_m}$ with $m=I\alpha$ with $I=\{1..N_\text{atoms}\}$ and $\alpha=\{1..3\}$
homogeneous strains ${\textstyle \eta_j}$ with ${\textstyle j=\{1..6\}}$
static electric field ${\textstyle \mathcal{E}_\alpha}$ with ${\textstyle \alpha=\{1..3\}}$

By performing a Taylor expansion of the total energy in terms of these perturbations we obtain^[1]

{\displaystyle \begin{aligned} E(u,\mathcal{E},\eta) = &E_0 + \\ &\frac{\partial E}{\partial u_m} u_m + \frac{\partial E}{\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha} \mathcal{E}_\alpha+ \frac{\partial E}{\partial \eta_j} \eta_j + \\ &\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 E} {\partial u_m \partial u_n } u_m u_n + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 E} {\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha \partial \mathcal{E}_\beta } \mathcal{E}_\alpha \mathcal{E}_\beta + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2 E} {\partial \eta_j \partial \eta_k} \eta_j \eta_k + \\ &\frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial u_m \partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha} u_m \mathcal{E}_\alpha + \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial u_m \partial \eta_j} u_m \eta_j + \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha \partial \eta_j} \mathcal{E}_\alpha \eta_j + \text{terms of higher order} \end{aligned} }

The derivatives of the energy with respect to an electric field are the polarization, with respect to atomic displacements are the forces, with respect to changes in the lattice vectors are the stress tensor.

{\displaystyle P_\alpha = -\frac{\partial E}{\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha} \qquad \text{polarization} }

{\displaystyle F_m = -\Omega_0\frac{\partial E}{\partial u_m} \qquad \text{forces} }

{\displaystyle \sigma_j = \frac{\partial E}{\partial \eta_j} \qquad \text{stresses} }

This leads to the following ‘clamped-ion’ or ‘frozen-ion’ definitions:

{\displaystyle \overline{\chi}_{\alpha\beta} = - \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha \partial \mathcal{E}_\beta} |_{u,\eta} \qquad \text{dielectric susceptibility} }

{\displaystyle \overline{C}_{jk} = \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial \eta_j \partial \eta_k} |_{u,\mathcal{E}} \qquad \text{elastic tensor} }

{\displaystyle \Phi_{mn}=\Omega_0 \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial u_m \partial u_n} |_{\mathcal{E},\eta} \qquad \text{force-constants} }

{\displaystyle \overline{e}_{\alpha k} = \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha \partial \eta_k} |_{u} \qquad \text{piezoelectric tensor} }

{\displaystyle Z_{m\alpha}=-\Omega_0 \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial u_m \partial \mathcal{E}_\alpha} |_{\eta} \qquad \text{Born effective charges} }

{\displaystyle \Xi_{mj}=-\Omega_0 \frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial u_m \partial \eta_j} |_{\mathcal{E}} \qquad \text{force response internal strain tensor} }

To compare with experimental results, however, the static response properties should take into account the ionic relaxation. This follows from the Taylor expansion above by looking at the ionic positions where the energy is minimal:

{\displaystyle \tilde{E}(\mathcal{E},\eta) = \text{min}_u E(u,\mathcal{E},\eta) }

The physical ‘relaxed-ion’ tensors are

{\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \chi_{\alpha\beta} &= \overline{\chi}_{\alpha\beta} + \Omega_0^{-1} Z_{m\alpha} (\Phi)^{-1}_{mn} Z_{n\beta} \qquad \text{dielectric susceptibility}\\ C_{jk} &= \overline{C}_{jk} + \Omega_0^{-1} \Xi_{mj} (\Phi)^{-1}_{mn} \Xi_{nk} \qquad \text{elastic tensor}\\ e_{\alpha j} &= \overline{e}_{\alpha j} + \Omega_0^{-1}Z_{m\alpha} (\Phi)^{-1}_{mn} \Xi_{nj} \qquad \text{piezoelectric tensor} \end{aligned} }

The second term on the right-hand side of each of these equations is called the ionic contributions to the dielectric susceptibility, elastic tensor, and piezoelectric tensor.

The ionic contributions to the dielectric tensor are: