Category:NMR

From VASP Wiki
Energy E against the magnetic field Bext showing how the energy difference ΔE (red) between the spin up and down electrons changes with increasing magnetic field strength. This results in a slight difference in population between the up (purple) and down (green) states, the lower energy down state that is aligned with Bext being more populated according to the Boltzmann distribution.

Density-functional theory (DFT) can be used to calculate various nuclear properties of a crystal measurable through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and associated methods. In the Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) approach, a frozen core approximation is used. The Kohn-Sham (KS) states near the nucleus are correctly described using all-electron (AE) partial waves.

Chemical shielding

The external magnetic field Bext (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field Bin (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from Bext.

The chemical shift δ is a property that describes the shielding of an applied, external magnetic field B felt by a nucleus with non-zero spin. The chemical shift is the difference in chemical shielding σ relative to a reference σref.

The chemical shielding tensor can be calculated using the Gauge-Including PAW (GIPAW) method, using the LCHIMAG tag [1][2]. The chemical shielding is calculated via the induced current (cf. WRT_NMRCUR) [1][2] and has contributions from the plane-wave grid and one-center contributions (the induced field at the center of a PAW sphere due to the augmentation current inside that sphere). These are for individual atoms and exclude the contribution due to the augmentation currents in other PAW spheres. If two-center terms are important, e.g. for H, then they should be included using LLRAUG [3][4].

Magnetic susceptibility

The macroscopic magnetic susceptibility is the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field [5].

where is the external magnetic field and is the induced magnetic field.

The orbital magnetic susceptibility is calculated via a finite-differences approach, where a key variable Qij is approximated in two ways. The so-called pGv-approximation is used by default [2], where p is momentum, v is velocity, and G is a Green's function. An alternative approach, the vGv-approximation is available to calculate the susceptibility [6], which can be switched off using LVGVCALC. With LVGVAPPL one can force VASP to use the vGv result for the contribution instead of the pGv used as default. With LVGVCALC one can suppress the calculation of the vGv magnetic susceptibility.

Like the chemical shielding, the magnetic susceptibility is calculated by linear response using LCHIMAG [1][2], so they will both be shown in the same OUTCAR file.

Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient

The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient V in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)

Nuclei with I > ± ½ have a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) and an electronic quadrupolar moment. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical enviornment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) [7]. The all-electron (AE) nature of the PAW approach makes it particularly suitable for calculating the EFG. The EFG is the second derivative of the potential :

,

which is a sum of three parts along the Cartesian i,j axes:

where is the plane-wave part of the AE potential, is the one-cener expansion of the pseudopotential method, and is the one-center expansion of the AE potential.

In VASP, the EFG is calculated using the LEFG tag. The commonly reported nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant Cq is then printed using isotope-specific quadrupole moment defined using QUAD_EFG [8].

Hyperfine coupling

Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.

The hyperfine tensor describes the interaction between a nuclear spin and the electronic spin distribution (in most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state measureable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [9]):

.

The hyperfine tensor is split into two terms, isotropic (or Fermi contact) and anisotropic (or dipolar contributions) :

.

Within the PAW approach, is calculated from the spin-density , which is split into three terms, the pseudo-spin-density , and the one-center expansions of the true- and pseudo-spin density, and , respectively [10]:

.

is calculated from the equivalent three dipolar-dipolar contribution terms :

Both the Fermi contact and dipolar contribution terms are related to the nuclear gyromagnetic moment γ, which are defined in NGYROMAG. The hyperfine tensor calculation itself is defined using LHYPERFINE.

References

  1. a b c C. J. Pickard and F. Mauri, All-electron magnetic response with pseudopotentials: NMR chemical shifts, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245101 (2001).
  2. a b c d J. R. Yates, C. J. Pickard, and F. Mauri, Calculation of NMR chemical shifts for extended systems using ultrasoft pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 76, 024401 (2007).
  3. F. Vasconcelos, G.A. de Wijs, R. W. A. Havenith, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Finite-field implementation of NMR chemical shieldings for molecules: Direct and converse gauge-including projector-augmented-wave methods, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 014109 (2013).
  4. G.A. de Wijs, G. Kresse, R. W. A. Havenith, and M. Marsman, Comparing GIPAW with numerically exact chemical shieldings: The role of two-center contributions to the induced current, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 234101 (2021).
  5. F. Mauri, S. G. Louie, Magnetic Susceptibility of Insulators from First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4246 (1996).
  6. M. d'Avezac, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Spin and orbital magnetic response in metals: Susceptibility and NMR shifts, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165122 (2007).
  7. Nuclear quadrupole resonance, www.wikipedia.org (2025)
  8. H. M. Petrilli, P. E. Blöchl, P. Blaha, and K. Schwarz, Electric-field-gradient calculations using the projector augmented wave method, Phys. Rev. B 57, 14690 (1998).
  9. J. Weil and J. Bolton, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications, (2007).
  10. K. Szasz, T. Hornos, M. Marsman, and A. Gali, Hyperfine coupling of point defects in semiconductors by hybrid density functional calculations: The role of core spin polarization, Phys. Rev. B, 88, 075202 (2013).

Subcategories

This category has only the following subcategory.

Pages in category "NMR"

The following 14 pages are in this category, out of 14 total.