Electron-energy-loss spectrum: Difference between revisions
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Inclusion of local fields= | =Inclusion of local fields= | ||
In general | In general <math>\epsilon^{-1}</math> is a function of two coordinates, i.e. <math>\epsilon^{-1} := \epsilon^{-1}(\mathbf r , \mathbf r', \omega)</math>. This has important consequences on inhomogeneous systems, where a homogeneous, constant, external electric field can induce fluctuations at the interatomic scale, and thus create microscopic fields. A direct consequence from the inhomogeneous character of the system is that <math>\epsilon</math> has to be written as <math>\epsilon_{\mathbf G, \mathbf G'}(\mathbf q, \omega)</math>, where <math> \mathbf G</math> is a reciprocal lattice vector. The microscopic fields are then the <math>\mathbf G \neq 0</math> components of the tensor. | ||
From <math>\epsilon^{-1} = 1 + v\chi</math> it is possible to see that a problem arises when <math>\mathbf q \to 0</math>, i.e. the optical limit. In reciprocal space this equation becomes | From <math>\epsilon^{-1} = 1 + v\chi</math> it is possible to see that a problem arises when <math>\mathbf q \to 0</math>, i.e. the optical limit. In reciprocal space this equation becomes |
Revision as of 17:19, 13 February 2025
One of the many ways with which is possible to probe neutral excitations in a material is by injecting electrons into the sample. These are called electron-energy-loss spectroscopy experiments, where the incoming electron can create electron-hole pairs, plasmons, or even higher-order multi-pair excitations.
The incoming electron acts as an external potential, , which induces a charge density in the material, . Within linear-response theory these two quantities can be related by the reducible polarisability function, , via a Green-Kubo relation
If the external potential is taken as proportional to a plane-wave of momentum , then the electron energy-loss spectrum (EELS) can be taken from the imaginary part of the inverse dielectric function, , since
Inclusion of local fields
In general is a function of two coordinates, i.e. . This has important consequences on inhomogeneous systems, where a homogeneous, constant, external electric field can induce fluctuations at the interatomic scale, and thus create microscopic fields. A direct consequence from the inhomogeneous character of the system is that has to be written as , where is a reciprocal lattice vector. The microscopic fields are then the components of the tensor.
From it is possible to see that a problem arises when , i.e. the optical limit. In reciprocal space this equation becomes
where is the Coulomb potential. At , all components without microscopic fields are divergent. To circumvent this issue, the evaluation of is replaced the Coulomb potential with
leaving the component to be dealt with separately and then added at the end.
Micro-macro connection and relation to measured quantity
It is important to note that the actual measured quantity, , does not depend on the microscopic fields. To connect both the microscopic and macroscopic quantities, an averaging procedure is taken out, so that
Since VASP computes the macroscopic function, the final result can be linked to EELS via
Note that the inclusion of local fields and the connection to the macroscopic observable must be considered regardless of the level of approximation to the polarisability function, . Within VASP, this can be done at several levels of approximation, which are discussed in the next section.
Accounting for electron-hole interaction
EELS from density functional theory
The simplest way to compute the dielectric function is by