Coulomb singularity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
V(q)=\frac{4\pi}{q^{2}}\left(1-\cos(q R_{\text{c}})\right) | V(q)=\frac{4\pi}{q^{2}}\left(1-\cos(q R_{\text{c}})\right) | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
whose value at <math>q=0</math> is finite and is given by | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
V(0)=2\pi R_{\text{c}}^{2} | V(0)=2\pi R_{\text{c}}^{2} |
Revision as of 11:42, 10 May 2022
The bare Coulomb operator
in the unscreened HF exchange has a representation in the reciprocal space that is given by
It has a singularity at , and to alleviate this issue and to improve the convergence of the exact exchange with respect to the supercell size (or the k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods[1], probe-charge Ewald [2] (HFALPHA), and Coulomb truncation methods[3] (HFRCUT). These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel in the limit of large supercell sizes. These methods are described below.
Truncation methods
The potential is truncated by multiplying it by the step function , and in the reciprocal this leads to
whose value at is finite and is given by
The screened potentials
and
have representations in the reciprocal space that are given by
and
respectively. Thus, the screened potentials have no singularity at .