Practical guide to GW calculations: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__TOC__
The [[The GW approximation of Hedin's equations|GW approximation]] is an approximation to the self-energy. GW calculations are available as of VASP.5.X. For details on the implementation and use of the ''GW'' routines, we recommend the papers by Shishkin ''et al.'' {{cite|shishkin:prb:2006}} {{cite|shishkin:prb:2007}} {{cite|shishkin:prl:2007}} and Fuchs ''et al.'' {{cite|fuchs:prb:2007}}.
A brief summary of the theoretical background can be found [[The GW approximation of Hedin's equations|here]].
 
Available as of VASP.5.X. For details on the implementation and use of the ''GW'' routines we recommend the papers by Shishkin ''et al.''<ref name="shishkin-PRB74"/><ref name="shishkin-PRB75"/><ref name="shishkin:prl:07"/> and Fuchs ''et al.''<ref name="fuchs-PRB76"/>


<span id="GW_in_one_go">
<span id="GW_in_one_go">
Line 18: Line 15:


== Caveats ==  
== Caveats ==  
The single step GW procedure performs a DFT step internally with an exact diagonalization of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian using the maximum available {{TAGBL|NBANDS}} supported for the chosen {{TAGBL|ENCUT}} value.  
The single-step GW procedure performs a DFT step internally with an exact diagonalization of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian using the maximum available {{TAGBL|NBANDS}} supported for the chosen {{TAGBL|ENCUT}} value.  
Consequently, a large number of unoccupied bands is initialized with random plane-wave coefficients. In rare cases this yields to linear dependent column vectors in the Hamiltonian and results in LAPACK errors like "ZPOTRF fails". These errors can be prevented using the two-step GW procedure as described below. Furthermore, one can "ramp up" NBANDS to the maximum value by repeatedly restarting the DFT calculation from a pre-converged {{TAGBL|WAVECAR}} with less bands.
Consequently, a large number of unoccupied bands is initialized with random plane-wave coefficients. In rare cases, this yields two linearly dependent column vectors in the Hamiltonian and results in LAPACK errors like "ZPOTRF fails". These errors can be prevented using the two-step GW procedure as described below. Furthermore, one can "ramp up" NBANDS to the maximum value by repeatedly restarting the DFT calculation from a pre-converged {{TAGBL|WAVECAR}} with fewer bands.


</span>
</span>
Line 47: Line 44:
  {{TAGBL|LOPTICS}} = .TRUE.
  {{TAGBL|LOPTICS}} = .TRUE.


Furthermore note that the flag {{TAG|LOPTICS}}=.TRUE. is required in order to write the file {{FILE|WAVEDER}}, which contains the derivative of the orbitals with respect to '''k'''.  
Furthermore, note that the flag {{TAG|LOPTICS}}=.TRUE. is required to write the file {{FILE|WAVEDER}}, which contains the derivative of the orbitals with respect to '''k'''.  
This derivative is used to construct the head and wings of the dielectric matrix employing '''k'''&middot;'''p''' perturbation theory and is important to accelerate k-point convergence for insulators and semiconductors. {{NB|warning|For metals, in general, we recommend to omit the {{TAG|LOPTICS}} tag and remove the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file from the directory.}}  
This derivative is used to construct the head and wings of the dielectric matrix employing '''k'''&middot;'''p''' perturbation theory and is important to accelerate k-point convergence for insulators and semiconductors. {{NB|warning|For metals, in general, we recommend omitting the {{TAG|LOPTICS}} tag and removing the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file from the directory.}}  


== Optional: Use Hybrid functionals ==
== Optional: Use Hybrid functionals ==
Line 107: Line 104:
Convergence with respect to the number of empty bands {{TAG|NBANDS}} and with respect to the number of frequencies {{TAG|NOMEGA}} must be checked carefully.
Convergence with respect to the number of empty bands {{TAG|NBANDS}} and with respect to the number of frequencies {{TAG|NOMEGA}} must be checked carefully.


To avoid complicated inter-nested tests, we recommend to calculate all orbitals that the plane wave basis set allows to calculate (except for simple tests). For further reading please consult the section on {{TAG|ENCUTGW}}.
To avoid complicated inter-nested tests, we recommend calculating all orbitals that the plane-wave basis set allows to calculate (except for simple tests). For further reading, please consult the section on {{TAG|ENCUTGW}}.


After a successful G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> run, VASP will write the quasi-particle energies into the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file for a set of {{TAG|NBANDSGW}} bands for every k-point in the Brillouin zone. Look for lines similar to  
After a successful G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> run, VASP will write the quasi-particle energies into the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file for a set of {{TAG|NBANDSGW}} bands for every k-point in the Brillouin zone. Look for lines similar to  
Line 140: Line 137:
</span>
</span>


but keeping <math>W</math> and the orbitals <math>\phi^{(0)}_{n{\bf q}}</math> fixed to the initial DFT level. This method goes back to Hybertsen and Louie<ref name="HybertsenLouie"/> and can be achieved in two ways.  
but keeping <math>W</math> and the orbitals <math>\phi^{(0)}_{n{\bf q}}</math> fixed to the initial DFT level. This method goes back to Hybertsen and Louie {{cite|hybertsen:prb:1986}} and can be achieved in two ways.  


If the spectral method is not selected ({{TAG|LSPECTRAL}}=.FALSE., requiring much more compute time), the quasi-particle (QP) shifts are iterated automatically four times, and one finds four sets of QP shifts in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file. The first one corresponds to the G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> case. The {{FILE|INCAR}} file is simply:
If the spectral method is not selected ({{TAG|LSPECTRAL}}=.FALSE., requiring much more compute time), the quasi-particle (QP) shifts are iterated automatically four times, and one finds four sets of QP shifts in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file. The first one corresponds to the G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> case. The {{FILE|INCAR}} file is simply:
Line 150: Line 147:
  {{TAGBL|LSPECTRAL}} =.FALSE.
  {{TAGBL|LSPECTRAL}} =.FALSE.


For technical reasons, it is not possible to iterate <math>G</math> in this manner if {{TAG|LSPECTRAL}}=.TRUE. is set in the {{FILE|INCAR}} file (this is the default). In this case, an iteration number must be supplied in the {{FILE|INCAR}} file using the {{TAG|NELM}}-tag. Usually three to four iterations are sufficient to obtain accurate QP shifts.
For technical reasons, it is not possible to iterate <math>G</math> in this manner if {{TAG|LSPECTRAL}}=.TRUE. is set in the {{FILE|INCAR}} file (this is the default). In this case, an iteration number must be supplied in the {{FILE|INCAR}} file using the {{TAG|NELM}}-tag. Usually, three to four iterations are sufficient to obtain accurate QP shifts.


  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
Line 174: Line 171:
       7      -0.6957      -0.7006    -13.6827      12.9802    -18.1531      0.7264      2.0000      0.2769
       7      -0.6957      -0.7006    -13.6827      12.9802    -18.1531      0.7264      2.0000      0.2769


In contrast to single shot GW calculations, the second column represent now the QP-energies form previous iteration.   
In contrast to single shot GW calculations, the second column represent now the QP-energies from the previous iteration.   
<span id="qpgw0">
<span id="qpgw0">


Line 187: Line 184:
  {{TAGBL|NELMGW}} = 4 ! use NELM for VASP.6.2 and older
  {{TAGBL|NELMGW}} = 4 ! use NELM for VASP.6.2 and older


In this case, the orbitals are updated as well by constructing a hermitian (energy independent) approximation to the self-energy.<ref name="shishkin:prl:07"/> The "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting {{TAG|NOMEGA}} = 1.<ref name="bruneval:prb:06"/> To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density (and the charge density only) is mixed using a Kerker type mixing in VASP.5.3.2 and more recent versions (see {{TAG|IMIX}}). The mixing parameters {{TAG|AMIX}}, {{TAG|BMIX}}, {{TAG|AMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|BMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|AMIN}} can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered.
In this case, the orbitals are updated as well by constructing a hermitian (energy independent) approximation to the self-energy {{cite|shishkin:prl:2007}}. The "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting {{TAG|NOMEGA}} = 1 {{cite|bruneval:prb:06}}. To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density (and the charge density only) is mixed using a Kerker type mixing in VASP.5.3.2 and more recent versions (see {{TAG|IMIX}}). The mixing parameters {{TAG|AMIX}}, {{TAG|BMIX}}, {{TAG|AMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|BMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|AMIN}} can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered.
We strongly urge the user to monitor convergence by inspecting the lines <pre>charge density residual</pre> in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} files.
We strongly urge the user to monitor convergence by inspecting the lines <pre>charge density residual</pre> in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} files.


Alternatively the mixing may be switched off by setting {{TAG|IMIX}}=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter {{TAG|TIME}} (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm, that is also used for DFT methods when {{TAG|ALGO}}=Damped. In general, this method is more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.
Alternatively, the mixing may be switched off by setting {{TAG|IMIX}}=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter {{TAG|TIME}} (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm that is also used for DFT methods when {{TAG|ALGO}}=Damped. This method is generally more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.


After every iteration VASP writes following lines into the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file
After every iteration, VASP writes the following lines into the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file
   
   
  QP shifts <psi_nk| G(iteration)W_0 |psi_nk>: iteration 1
  QP shifts <psi_nk| G(iteration)W_0 |psi_nk>: iteration 1
Line 209: Line 206:
       8      5.1013      4.1883      4.2149      3.9518      0.7711      2.0000
       8      5.1013      4.1883      4.2149      3.9518      0.7711      2.0000


For the first iteration, here the forth column should be identical to the third column of the G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> results discussed above, while the third column reports the quasi-particle energies obtained from including the off-diagonal matrix elements in the eigenvalue equation.  
For the first iteration, here, the fourth column should be identical to the third column of the G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> results discussed above. The third column reports the quasi-particle energies obtained from including the off-diagonal matrix elements in the eigenvalue equation.  


=== Caveats ===
=== Caveats ===
The ''QPGW0'' (or ''scGW0'' in VASP.5.2.11 and older) must be used with great caution, in particular, in combination with symmetry.
The ''QPGW0'' (or ''scGW0'' in VASP.5.2.11 and older) must be used with great caution, particularly in combination with symmetry.
Symmetry is handled in a rather sophisticated manner, specifically, only the minimal number of required combination of ''q'' and ''k'' points is considered. In this case, symmetry must be applied to restore the full star of ''q''. This is done by determining degenerate eigenvalue/eigenvector pairs and restoring their symmetry according to their irreducible representation. Although the procedure is generally rather reliable, it fails to work properly if the degenerate states do not posses eigenvalues that are sufficiently close, due to insufficient convergence in the preceding DFT calculations. States are treated as degenerate if, and only if, their eigenenergies are within 0.01 eV.
Symmetry is handled in a rather sophisticated manner. Specifically, only the minimal number of required combinations of ''q'' and ''k'' points is considered. In this case, symmetry must be applied to restore the full star of ''q''. This is done by determining degenerate eigenvalue/eigenvector pairs and restoring their symmetry according to their irreducible representation. Although the procedure is generally relatively reliable, it fails to work properly if the degenerate states do not possess eigenvalues that are sufficiently close due to insufficient convergence in the preceding DFT calculations. That is because states are treated as degenerate if, and only if, their eigenenergies are within 0.01 eV.


For large supercells with low symmetry, we strongly recommend to switch off symmetry.
For large supercells with low symmetry, we strongly recommend switching off symmetry.
</span>
</span>


Line 229: Line 226:
  {{TAGBL|ALGO}} = QPGW    ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older, eigenvalues and one electron orbitals
  {{TAGBL|ALGO}} = QPGW    ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older, eigenvalues and one electron orbitals
   
   
For QPGW0 or QPGW non diagonal terms in the Hamiltonian are accounted for, ''e.g.'' the linearized QP equation is diagonalized, and the one electron orbitals are updated.<ref name="shishkin:prl:07"/>
For QPGW0 or QPGW, nondiagonal terms in the Hamiltonian are accounted for, ''e.g.'' the linearized QP equation is diagonalized, and the one-electron orbitals are updated {{cite|shishkin:prl:2007}}.
Alternatively (and preferably), the user can specify an electronic iteration counter using {{TAG|NELMGW}} ({{TAG|NELM}} in VASP.6.2 and older):
Alternatively (and preferably), the user can specify an electronic iteration counter using {{TAG|NELMGW}} ({{TAG|NELM}} in VASP.6.2 and older):


Line 240: Line 237:
  {{TAGBL|ALGO}} = QPGW  ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older
  {{TAGBL|ALGO}} = QPGW  ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older


In this case, the one-electron energies (=QP energies) are updated 3 times (starting from the DFT eigenvalues) in both G and W. For {{TAG|ALGO}}=''QPGW'' (or {{TAG|ALGO}}=''scGW'' in VASP.5.2.11 and older), the one electron energies and one electron orbitals are updated 3 times.<ref name="shishkin:prl:07"/> As for {{TAG|ALGO}} = ''QPGW0'' (or ''scGW0'' in vasp.5.2.11 and older), the "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting {{TAG|NOMEGA}}=1.<ref name="bruneval:prb:06"/>
In this case, the one-electron energies (=QP energies) are updated 3 times (starting from the DFT eigenvalues) in both G and W. For {{TAG|ALGO}}=''QPGW'' (or {{TAG|ALGO}}=''scGW'' in VASP.5.2.11 and older), the one electron energies and one electron orbitals are updated 3 times {{cite|shishkin:prl:2007}}. As for {{TAG|ALGO}} = ''QPGW0'' (or ''scGW0'' in vasp.5.2.11 and older), the "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting {{TAG|NOMEGA}}=1 {{cite|bruneval:prb:06}}.


To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density is mixed using a Kerker type mixing starting with VASP.5.3.2 (see {{TAG|IMIX}}). The mixing parameters {{TAG|AMIX}}, {{TAG|BMIX}}, {{TAG|AMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|BMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|AMIN}} can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered.
To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density is mixed using a Kerker type mixing starting with VASP.5.3.2 (see {{TAG|IMIX}}). The mixing parameters {{TAG|AMIX}}, {{TAG|BMIX}}, {{TAG|AMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|BMIX_MAG}}, {{TAG|AMIN}} can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered.
Alternatively the mixing may be switched off by setting {{TAG|IMIX}}=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter {{TAG|TIME}} (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm, that is also used for DFT methods when {{TAG|ALGO}}=Damped. In general, this method is more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.
Alternatively, the mixing may be switched off by setting {{TAG|IMIX}}=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter {{TAG|TIME}} (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm that is also used for DFT methods when {{TAG|ALGO}}=Damped. This method is generally more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.


Additional information about this method is found [[The GW approximation of Hedin's equations#GWLimitations|here]].
Additional information about this method is found [[The GW approximation of Hedin's equations#GWLimitations|here]].


=== Caveats ===
=== Caveats ===
Fully self-consistent QPGW calculations with an update of the orbitals in <math>G</math> and <math>W</math><ref name="shishkin:prl:07"/> require significant care and are prone to diverge (QPGW0 calculations are usually less critical). As discussed, above, one can select this mode using:
Fully self-consistent QPGW calculations with an update of the orbitals in <math>G</math> and <math>W</math>{{cite|shishkin:prl:2007}} require significant care and are prone to diverge (QPGW0 calculations are usually less critical). As discussed, above, one can select this mode using:


  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
Line 258: Line 255:
However, one ''caveat'' applies to this case: when the orbitals are updated, the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math> (stored in the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file) will become incompatible with the orbitals.
However, one ''caveat'' applies to this case: when the orbitals are updated, the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math> (stored in the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file) will become incompatible with the orbitals.
This can cause severe problems and convergence to the incorrect solution.  
This can cause severe problems and convergence to the incorrect solution.  
{{NB|warning|For metals, in general, we recommend to omit the {{TAG|LOPTICS}} tag and remove the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file from the directory.}}  
{{NB|warning|For metals, in general, we recommend omitting the {{TAG|LOPTICS}} tag and removing the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file from the directory.}}  


For insulators, VASP (version 5.3.2 or higher) can update the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file in each electronic iteration if the finite difference method is used to calculate the first derivative of the orbitals with respect to <math> k </math>:
For insulators, VASP (version 5.3.2 or higher) can update the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file in each electronic iteration if the finite difference method is used to calculate the first derivative of the orbitals with respect to <math> k </math>:
Line 270: Line 267:


The combination <tt>{{TAG|LOPTICS}}=.TRUE.; {{TAG|LPEAD}}=.TRUE.</tt> is required since <math>\frac{\delta H-\epsilon_{n{\bf k}}S}{\delta {k}_i}</math> is not available for ''GW'' like methods.
The combination <tt>{{TAG|LOPTICS}}=.TRUE.; {{TAG|LPEAD}}=.TRUE.</tt> is required since <math>\frac{\delta H-\epsilon_{n{\bf k}}S}{\delta {k}_i}</math> is not available for ''GW'' like methods.
{{TAG|LPEAD}}=.TRUE. circumvents this problems by calculating the derivatives of the orbitals using numerical differentiation on the finite k-point grid (this option is presently limited to insulators).
{{TAG|LPEAD}}=.TRUE. circumvents this problem by calculating the derivatives of the orbitals using numerical differentiation on the finite k-point grid (this option is presently limited to insulators).


Vertex corrections are presently not documented. This is a feature still under construction, and we recommend to collaborate with the Vienna group if you are desperately in need of that feature.
Vertex corrections are presently not documented. This is a feature still under construction, and we recommend collaborating with the Vienna group if you desperately need that feature.
</span>
</span>


Line 279: Line 276:
= Low scaling GW algorithms =
= Low scaling GW algorithms =


The GW implementations in VASP described in the papers of Shishkin ''et al.''<ref name="shishkin-PRB74"/><ref name="shishkin-PRB75"/> avoids storage of the Green's function <math>G</math> as well as Fourier transformations between time and frequency domain entirely. That is, all calculations are performed solely on the real frequency axis using Kramers-Kronig transformations for convolutions in the equation of <math>\chi</math> and <math>\Sigma</math> in reciprocal space.  
The GW implementations in VASP described in the papers of Shishkin ''et al.''{{cite|shishkin:prb:2006}} {{cite|shishkin:prb:2007}} avoids storage of the Green's function <math>G</math> as well as Fourier transformations between time and frequency domain entirely. That is, all calculations are performed solely on the real frequency axis using Kramers-Kronig transformations for convolutions in the equation of <math>\chi</math> and <math>\Sigma</math> in reciprocal space.  


As of VASP.6 a new cubic scaling GW algorithm<ref name="liu"/> (called space-time implementation in the following) can be selected. This approach follows the idea of Rojas ''et al.''<ref name="rojas"/> and performs the GW self-consistency cycle on imaginary time <math>t\to i\tau</math> and imaginary frequency axes <math>\omega\to i\omega</math>.  
As of VASP.6 a new cubic scaling GW algorithm {{cite|liu:prb:2016}} (called space-time implementation in the following) can be selected. This approach follows the idea of Rojas ''et al.'' {{cite|rojas:prl:1995}} and performs the GW self-consistency cycle on imaginary time <math>t\to i\tau</math> and imaginary frequency axes <math>\omega\to i\omega</math>.  
{{NB|tip|Using the low-scaling GW algorithm also calculates the total energy in the Random Phase approximation (RPA), which is described in a [[ACFDT/RPA calculations#ACFDTR/RPAR|separate article]].}}
{{NB|tip|Using the low-scaling GW algorithm also calculates the total energy in the Random Phase approximation (RPA), which is described in a [[ACFDT/RPA calculations#ACFDTR/RPAR|separate article]].}}


Line 293: Line 290:


This algorithm evaluates:
This algorithm evaluates:
* Single-shot GW quasi-particle energies (from an analytical continuation of the self-energy to the real axis)<ref name="liu"/>
* Single-shot GW quasi-particle energies (from an analytical continuation of the self-energy to the real axis){{cite|liu:prb:2016}}


* Natural orbitals from the first order change of the density matrix (i.e. <math>G_0 \Sigma G_0</math>), see the {{TAG|NATURALO}} tag for more information.<ref name="ramberger"/>
* Natural orbitals from the first order change of the density matrix (i.e. <math>G_0 \Sigma G_0</math>), see the {{TAG|NATURALO}} tag for more information {{cite|ramberger:jcp:2019}}.


'''N.B.''' This selection ignores {{TAG|NELM}}.  
'''N.B.''' This selection ignores {{TAG|NELM}}.  
Line 307: Line 304:
  {{TAGBL|NOMEGA}} = 12 ! small number of frequencies necessary
  {{TAGBL|NOMEGA}} = 12 ! small number of frequencies necessary
   
   
Search the {{TAGBL|OUTCAR}} file for following lines
Search the {{TAGBL|OUTCAR}} file for the following lines


   QP shifts evaluated in KS or natural orbital/ Bruckner basis
   QP shifts evaluated in KS or natural orbital/ Bruckner basis
Line 321: Line 318:


Here column four is obtained by a linearization of the self-energy around the Kohn-Sham energies (second column) and can be compared to the third column of [[GW calculations#G0W0|single-shot GW calculations on the real axis]].
Here column four is obtained by a linearization of the self-energy around the Kohn-Sham energies (second column) and can be compared to the third column of [[GW calculations#G0W0|single-shot GW calculations on the real axis]].
Column six represents an other set of QP-energies that is obtained from the roots of following equation
Column six represents another set of QP-energies that is obtained from the roots of the following equation


<math>
<math>
Line 333: Line 330:
Optionally, RPA forces can be calculated by adding following line to the {{TAGBL|INCAR}}:
Optionally, RPA forces can be calculated by adding following line to the {{TAGBL|INCAR}}:
   {{TAGBL|LRPAFORCE}} = .TRUE.  
   {{TAGBL|LRPAFORCE}} = .TRUE.  
After the QP-energies VASP performs a linear response calculation that is required for the RPA forces.{{cite|ramberger:prl:118}}
After the QP-energies, VASP performs a linear-response calculation that is required for the RPA forces.{{cite|ramberger:prl:118}}
Following data block in the {{TAGBL|OUTCAR}} file can be found after a successful run:
Following data block in the {{TAGBL|OUTCAR}} file can be found after a successful run:


Line 351: Line 348:
<span id="scGW0R">
<span id="scGW0R">


== Partially self-consistent GW caluclations: GW0R ==
== Partially self-consistent GW calculations: GW0R ==
The space-time implementation allows for true self-consistent GW calculations. That is, the solution of the Dyson equation for the Green's function can be obtained with a modest computational effort. The main procedure of a self-consistent GW calculation consists of four main steps
The space-time implementation allows for true self-consistent GW calculations. That is, the solution of the Dyson equation for the Green's function can be obtained with a modest computational effort. The main procedure of a self-consistent GW calculation consists of four main steps
   
   
Line 370: Line 367:


Due to efficiency, VASP performs each step in the Hartree-Fock basis. This is the reason why there are two sets of QP-energies found after the first iteration (one for the QP-energies in the KS-basis and one for the QP energies in the HF basis)
Due to efficiency, VASP performs each step in the Hartree-Fock basis. This is the reason why there are two sets of QP-energies found after the first iteration (one for the QP-energies in the KS-basis and one for the QP energies in the HF basis)
After the second iteration only the QP energies obtained in the HF basis are printed and a similar output as follows is found in the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file  
After the second iteration, only the QP energies obtained in the HF basis are printed, and a similar output as follows is found in the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file  


  QP shifts evaluated in HF basis
  QP shifts evaluated in HF basis
Line 391: Line 388:


== Fully self-consistent GW caluclations: GWR ==
== Fully self-consistent GW caluclations: GWR ==
If the screened potential should be updated during the self-consistency circle<ref name="grumet"/> the following {{TAG|INCAR}} file can be used
If the screened potential should be updated during the self-consistency circle {{cite|grumet:prb:2018}} the following {{TAG|INCAR}} file can be used


  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
  {{TAGBL|System}} = SiC
Line 405: Line 402:
{{:Memory requirements of low-scaling GW and RPA algorithms}}
{{:Memory requirements of low-scaling GW and RPA algorithms}}


= Related Tags and Sections =
= Related tags and articles =


* {{TAG|ALGO}} for response functions and ''GW'' calculations
* {{TAG|ALGO}} for response functions and ''GW'' calculations
Line 427: Line 424:


= References =
= References =
<references>
 
<ref name="shishkin-PRB74">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035101 M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035101 (2006).]</ref>
 
<ref name="shishkin-PRB75">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.235102 M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 75, 235102 (2007).]</ref>
<ref name="shishkin:prl:07">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246403 M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246403 (2007).]</ref>
<ref name="fuchs-PRB76">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.115109 F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, M. Shishkin, and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 76, 115109 (2007).]</ref>
<ref name="liu">[http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165109 P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. Klimes and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165109 (2016).]</ref>
<ref name="rojas">[https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1827 H. N. Rojas, R. W. Godby, R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1827 (1995)]</ref>
<ref name="HybertsenLouie">[https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 M. S. Hybertsen, S. G. Louie Phys. Ref. B 34, 5390 (1986)]</ref>
<ref name="bruneval:prb:06">[http://link.aps.org/doi/PhysRevB.74.45102 F. Bruneval, N. Vast, and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. B 74, 45102 (2006).]</ref>
<ref name="grumet">[https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155143 M. Grumet, P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. Klimeš and Georg Kresse, Phys. Ref. B 98, 155143 (2018). ]</ref>
<ref name="ramberger">[https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5128415 B. Ramberger, Z. Surkuma, T. Schäfer, G. Kresse, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 214106 (2019). ]</ref>
</references>
----
[[Category:Many-Body Perturbation Theory]][[Category:GW]][[Category:Howto]][[Category:VASP6]][[Category:Low-scaling GW and RPA]]
[[Category:Many-Body Perturbation Theory]][[Category:GW]][[Category:Howto]][[Category:VASP6]][[Category:Low-scaling GW and RPA]]

Revision as of 16:31, 21 December 2021

The GW approximation is an approximation to the self-energy. GW calculations are available as of VASP.5.X. For details on the implementation and use of the GW routines, we recommend the papers by Shishkin et al. [1] [2] [3] and Fuchs et al. [4].

Single step procedure: GW in one go

As of VASP.6.3 all GW approximations can be run in one single run by selecting the corresponding ALGO tag and omitting NBANDS), for instance like so

System = SiC
ALGO = EVGW0, QPGW0, EVGW, QPGW, GW0R or GWR # use an algorithgm described below
NELMGW = 1,2,.. # number of self-consistency cycles
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05  ! small sigma is required to avoid partial occupancies
LOPTICS = .TRUE.  # for insulators, omit for metals

Note, NBANDS must not be present in the INCAR to select this procedure.

Important: In older versions a two step procedure is required, where the first step is always a DFT calculation and the second step the actual GW calculation.

The two-step procedure is described below.

Caveats

The single-step GW procedure performs a DFT step internally with an exact diagonalization of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian using the maximum available NBANDS supported for the chosen ENCUT value. Consequently, a large number of unoccupied bands is initialized with random plane-wave coefficients. In rare cases, this yields two linearly dependent column vectors in the Hamiltonian and results in LAPACK errors like "ZPOTRF fails". These errors can be prevented using the two-step GW procedure as described below. Furthermore, one can "ramp up" NBANDS to the maximum value by repeatedly restarting the DFT calculation from a pre-converged WAVECAR with fewer bands.

First step: DFT calculation

GW calculations always require a one-electron basis set. Usually this set is obtained from a standard DFT calculation and written into the WAVECAR file and can be calculated for instance the following INCAR file:

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05  ! small sigma is required to avoid partial occupancies
LOPTICS = .TRUE.

Note, that a significant number of empty bands is required for GW calculations, so that it might be better to perform the calculations in two steps: first a standard grounstate calculation with few unoccupied orbitals only,

System = SiC groundstate occupied orbitals
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05  ! small sigma is required to avoid partial occupancies
EDIFF = 1E-8               ! required tight tolerance for groundstate orbitals

and, second, a calculation of a large number of unoccupied orbitals

System  = SiC unoccupied orbitals
ALGO = Exact               ! use exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian
NELM = 1                   ! since we are already converged stop after one step
NBANDS = 512               ! maybe even larger                
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05  ! small sigma is required to avoid partial occupancies
LOPTICS = .TRUE.

Furthermore, note that the flag LOPTICS=.TRUE. is required to write the file WAVEDER, which contains the derivative of the orbitals with respect to k. This derivative is used to construct the head and wings of the dielectric matrix employing k·p perturbation theory and is important to accelerate k-point convergence for insulators and semiconductors.

Warning: For metals, in general, we recommend omitting the LOPTICS tag and removing the WAVEDER file from the directory.

Optional: Use Hybrid functionals

Optionally, one can start a GW calculation from a hybrid functional, such as HSE. For hybrid functionals, the two step procedure will accordingly involve the following INCAR files. In the first step, converged HSE03 orbitals are determined (see here for a selection of available hybrid functionals):

System  = SiC groundstate occupied orbitals
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = Damped ; TIME = 0.5  ! or ALGO = Conjugate
LHFCALC = .TRUE. ; AEXX = 0.25 ; HFSCREEN = 0.3 
EDIFF = 1E-6      ! required tight tolerance for groundstate orbitals

Secondly, determine the HSE03 orbitals for unoccupied states:

System  = SiC unoccupied orbitals
NBANDS = 512      ! maybe even larger
ALGO = Exact
NELM = 1          ! since we are already converged stop after one step
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
LHFCALC = .TRUE. ; AEXX = 0.25 ; HFSCREEN = 0.3 
LOPTICS = .TRUE. # for insulators

Step 2: GW step

The actual GW calculation is done in a second step. Here different GW flavors are possible and are selected with the ALGO tag.

Note that as of VASP.6 the GW ALGO tags have been renamed, see here for VASP.5.X tags.

Single shot quasi-particle energies: G0W0

This is the simplest GW calculation and computationally the most efficient one. A single-shot calculation is often referred to as G0W0 and calculates the quasi-particle energies from a single GW iteration by neglecting all off-diagonal matrix elements of the self-energy and employing a Taylor expansion of the self-energy around the DFT energies . The corresponding equation becomes

with the renormalization factor

In VASP, G0W0 calculations are selected using an INCAR file such as

System  = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
NELMGW = 1 ! use NELM for VASP.6.2 and older 
ALGO = EVGW0 ! use "GW0" for VASP.5.X
NOMEGA = 50

Convergence with respect to the number of empty bands NBANDS and with respect to the number of frequencies NOMEGA must be checked carefully.

To avoid complicated inter-nested tests, we recommend calculating all orbitals that the plane-wave basis set allows to calculate (except for simple tests). For further reading, please consult the section on ENCUTGW.

After a successful G0W0 run, VASP will write the quasi-particle energies into the OUTCAR file for a set of NBANDSGW bands for every k-point in the Brillouin zone. Look for lines similar to

QP shifts <psi_nk| G(iteration)W_0 |psi_nk>: iteration 1
for sc-GW calculations column KS-energies equals QP-energies in previous step 
and V_xc(KS)=  KS-energies - (<T + V_ion + V_H > + <T+V_H+V_ion>^1  + <V_x>^1)

k-point   1 :       0.0000    0.0000    0.0000
 band No.  KS-energies  QP-energies   sigma(KS)   V_xc(KS)     V^pw_x(r,r')   Z            occupation Imag(sigma)

     1      -7.1627      -8.3040     -14.5626     -12.7276     -21.6682       0.6219       2.0000       1.2037
     2      -2.0901      -3.4347     -15.7660     -14.2799     -21.7439       0.9048       2.0000       0.6914
     3      -2.0901      -3.4347     -15.7660     -14.2799     -21.7439       0.9048       2.0000       0.6914
     4      -2.0901      -3.4347     -15.7660     -14.2799     -21.7439       0.9048       2.0000       0.6914
     5       0.4603      -0.4663     -13.7603     -12.5200     -18.1532       0.7471       2.0000       0.2167
     6       0.4603      -0.4663     -13.7603     -12.5200     -18.1532       0.7471       2.0000       0.2167

The first column is the band index and the thrid column denotes the quasi-particle energies . Column two, four, five and seven refer to the DFT energies , diagonal matrix elements of the self-energy , the exchange-correlation potential and the renormalization factor defined above, respectively.

Partially self-consistent calculations: EVGW0

In most cases, the best results (i.e., closest to experiment) are obtained by iterating only via the spectral representation

but keeping and the orbitals fixed to the initial DFT level. This method goes back to Hybertsen and Louie [5] and can be achieved in two ways.

If the spectral method is not selected (LSPECTRAL=.FALSE., requiring much more compute time), the quasi-particle (QP) shifts are iterated automatically four times, and one finds four sets of QP shifts in the OUTCAR file. The first one corresponds to the G0W0 case. The INCAR file is simply:

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = EVGW0 ! use "GW0" in VASP.5.X
LSPECTRAL =.FALSE.

For technical reasons, it is not possible to iterate in this manner if LSPECTRAL=.TRUE. is set in the INCAR file (this is the default). In this case, an iteration number must be supplied in the INCAR file using the NELM-tag. Usually, three to four iterations are sufficient to obtain accurate QP shifts.

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = EVGW0 ! use "GW0" in VASP.5.X
NELMGW = 4 ! use NELM in VASP.6.2 and older

The results are found again in the OUTCAR file

QP shifts <psi_nk| G(iteration)W_0 |psi_nk>: iteration 4

k-point   1 :       0.0000    0.0000    0.0000
 band No. old QP-enery  QP-energies   sigma(KS)   T+V_ion+V_H  V^pw_x(r,r')   Z            occupation Imag(sigma)

     1      -8.6924      -8.7107     -14.2871       5.5647     -21.6681       0.6076       2.0000       1.1648
     2      -3.4692      -3.4806     -15.6742      12.1894     -21.7437       0.7304       2.0000       0.6351
     3      -3.4692      -3.4806     -15.6742      12.1894     -21.7437       0.7304       2.0000       0.6351
     4      -3.4692      -3.4806     -15.6742      12.1894     -21.7437       0.7304       2.0000       0.6351
     5      -0.6957      -0.7006     -13.6827      12.9802     -18.1531       0.7264       2.0000       0.2769
     6      -0.6957      -0.7006     -13.6827      12.9802     -18.1531       0.7264       2.0000       0.2769
     7      -0.6957      -0.7006     -13.6827      12.9802     -18.1531       0.7264       2.0000       0.2769

In contrast to single shot GW calculations, the second column represent now the QP-energies from the previous iteration.

Partially self-consistent quasi-particle calculations: QPGW0

If non diagonal components of the self-energy (in the orbital basis) should be included use ALGO=QPGW0. The following setting can be used:

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = QPGW0 ! or "scGW0" for VASP.5.2.11 and older 
LOPTICS = .TRUE. ; LPEAD = .TRUE. ! ommit this lines for metals
NELMGW = 4 ! use NELM for VASP.6.2 and older

In this case, the orbitals are updated as well by constructing a hermitian (energy independent) approximation to the self-energy [3]. The "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting NOMEGA = 1 [6]. To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density (and the charge density only) is mixed using a Kerker type mixing in VASP.5.3.2 and more recent versions (see IMIX). The mixing parameters AMIX, BMIX, AMIX_MAG, BMIX_MAG, AMIN can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered.

We strongly urge the user to monitor convergence by inspecting the lines

charge density residual

in the OUTCAR files.

Alternatively, the mixing may be switched off by setting IMIX=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter TIME (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm that is also used for DFT methods when ALGO=Damped. This method is generally more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.

After every iteration, VASP writes the following lines into the OUTCAR file

QP shifts <psi_nk| G(iteration)W_0 |psi_nk>: iteration 1
    GWSYM:  cpu time   15.8978: real time   15.9528

k-point   1 :       0.0000    0.0000    0.0000
 band No. DFT-energies  QP-energies  QP-e(diag)   sigma(DFT)    Z            occupation

     1      -7.1626      -8.4217      -8.3038      -8.9978       0.6219       2.0000
     2      -2.0899      -3.4394      -3.4347      -3.5765       0.9047       2.0000
     3      -2.0899      -3.4394      -3.4347      -3.5765       0.9047       2.0000
     4      -2.0899      -3.4394      -3.4347      -3.5765       0.9047       2.0000
     5       0.4604      -0.4787      -0.4663      -0.7800       0.7471       2.0000
     6       0.4604      -0.4787      -0.4663      -0.7800       0.7471       2.0000
     7       0.4604      -0.4787      -0.4663      -0.7800       0.7471       2.0000
     8       5.1013       4.1883       4.2149       3.9518       0.7711       2.0000

For the first iteration, here, the fourth column should be identical to the third column of the G0W0 results discussed above. The third column reports the quasi-particle energies obtained from including the off-diagonal matrix elements in the eigenvalue equation.

Caveats

The QPGW0 (or scGW0 in VASP.5.2.11 and older) must be used with great caution, particularly in combination with symmetry. Symmetry is handled in a rather sophisticated manner. Specifically, only the minimal number of required combinations of q and k points is considered. In this case, symmetry must be applied to restore the full star of q. This is done by determining degenerate eigenvalue/eigenvector pairs and restoring their symmetry according to their irreducible representation. Although the procedure is generally relatively reliable, it fails to work properly if the degenerate states do not possess eigenvalues that are sufficiently close due to insufficient convergence in the preceding DFT calculations. That is because states are treated as degenerate if, and only if, their eigenenergies are within 0.01 eV.

For large supercells with low symmetry, we strongly recommend switching off symmetry.

Self-consistent EVGW and QPGW calculations

Self-consistent QPGW calculations are only supported in a QP picture. As for QPGW0, it is possible to update the eigenvalues only (ALGO=EVGW or GW for VASP.5.X), or the eigenvalues and one-electron orbitals (ALGO=QPGW or scGW in VASP.5.2.11 and older). In all cases, a QP picture is maintained, i.e., satellite peaks (shake ups and shake downs) can not be accounted for in the self-consistency cycle. Self-consistent QPGW calculations can be performed by simply repeatedly calling VASP using:

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = EVGW    ! "GW" in VASP.5.X, eigenvalues only  or alternatively
ALGO = QPGW    ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older, eigenvalues and one electron orbitals

For QPGW0 or QPGW, nondiagonal terms in the Hamiltonian are accounted for, e.g. the linearized QP equation is diagonalized, and the one-electron orbitals are updated [3]. Alternatively (and preferably), the user can specify an electronic iteration counter using NELMGW (NELM in VASP.6.2 and older):

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
NELMGW = 3   ! use NELM in VASP.6.2 and older
ALGO = EVGW  ! "GW" in VASP.5.X 
# or  
ALGO = QPGW  ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older

In this case, the one-electron energies (=QP energies) are updated 3 times (starting from the DFT eigenvalues) in both G and W. For ALGO=QPGW (or ALGO=scGW in VASP.5.2.11 and older), the one electron energies and one electron orbitals are updated 3 times [3]. As for ALGO = QPGW0 (or scGW0 in vasp.5.2.11 and older), the "static" COHSEX approximation can be selected by setting NOMEGA=1 [6].

To improve convergence to the groundstate, the charge density is mixed using a Kerker type mixing starting with VASP.5.3.2 (see IMIX). The mixing parameters AMIX, BMIX, AMIX_MAG, BMIX_MAG, AMIN can be adjusted, if convergence problems are encountered. Alternatively, the mixing may be switched off by setting IMIX=0 and controlling the step width for the orbitals using the parameter TIME (which defaults to 0.4). This selects a fairly sophisticated damped MD algorithm that is also used for DFT methods when ALGO=Damped. This method is generally more reliable for metals and materials with strong charge sloshing.

Additional information about this method is found here.

Caveats

Fully self-consistent QPGW calculations with an update of the orbitals in and [3] require significant care and are prone to diverge (QPGW0 calculations are usually less critical). As discussed, above, one can select this mode using:

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = QPGW  ! or "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older, eigenvalues and one-electron orbitals
NELMGW = number of steps ! use NELM for VASP.6.2 and older

However, one caveat applies to this case: when the orbitals are updated, the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to (stored in the WAVEDER file) will become incompatible with the orbitals. This can cause severe problems and convergence to the incorrect solution.

Warning: For metals, in general, we recommend omitting the LOPTICS tag and removing the WAVEDER file from the directory.

For insulators, VASP (version 5.3.2 or higher) can update the WAVEDER file in each electronic iteration if the finite difference method is used to calculate the first derivative of the orbitals with respect to :

System = SiC
NBANDS = 512
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
ALGO = QPGW ! "scGW" in VASP.5.2.11 and older, eigenvalues and one-electron orbitals
NELMGW  = 10 ! use NELM in VASP.6.2 and older
LOPTICS = .TRUE. ; LPEAD = .TRUE.

The combination LOPTICS=.TRUE.; LPEAD=.TRUE. is required since is not available for GW like methods. LPEAD=.TRUE. circumvents this problem by calculating the derivatives of the orbitals using numerical differentiation on the finite k-point grid (this option is presently limited to insulators).

Vertex corrections are presently not documented. This is a feature still under construction, and we recommend collaborating with the Vienna group if you desperately need that feature.

Low scaling GW algorithms

The GW implementations in VASP described in the papers of Shishkin et al.[1] [2] avoids storage of the Green's function as well as Fourier transformations between time and frequency domain entirely. That is, all calculations are performed solely on the real frequency axis using Kramers-Kronig transformations for convolutions in the equation of and in reciprocal space.

As of VASP.6 a new cubic scaling GW algorithm [7] (called space-time implementation in the following) can be selected. This approach follows the idea of Rojas et al. [8] and performs the GW self-consistency cycle on imaginary time and imaginary frequency axes .

Tip: Using the low-scaling GW algorithm also calculates the total energy in the Random Phase approximation (RPA), which is described in a separate article.

Low scaling, single shot GW calculations: G0W0R

The low-scaling analogue of G0W0 is selected with ALGO=G0W0R. In contrast to the single-shot GW calculations on the real-axes, here the self-energy is determined on the imaginary frequency axis. To this end, the overall scaling is reduced by one order of magnitude and is cubic with respect to the system size, because a small value for NOMEGA can be used (usually <20).

This algorithm evaluates:

  • Single-shot GW quasi-particle energies (from an analytical continuation of the self-energy to the real axis)[7]
  • Natural orbitals from the first order change of the density matrix (i.e. ), see the NATURALO tag for more information [9].

N.B. This selection ignores NELM.

Following INCAR file selects the low-scaling GW algorithm:

System = SiC
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
LOPTICS = .TRUE.  
ALGO = G0W0R
NOMEGA = 12 ! small number of frequencies necessary

Search the OUTCAR file for the following lines

  QP shifts evaluated in KS or natural orbital/ Bruckner basis
  k-point   1 :       0.0000    0.0000    0.0000
  band No.  KS-energies   sigma(KS)    QP-e(linear)    Z         QP-e(zeros)     Z        occupation    Imag(E_QP)    QP_DIFF TAG
 
       1      -7.1627      -8.6732      -8.2451       0.7166      -8.2346       0.7026       2.0000      -1.3101       0.0000   2
       2      -2.0901      -3.4155      -3.0350       0.7129      -3.0272       0.7011       2.0000      -0.5582      -0.0000   2
       3      -2.0901      -3.4155      -3.0350       0.7129      -3.0272       0.7011       2.0000      -0.5582       0.0000   2
       4      -2.0901      -3.4155      -3.0350       0.7129      -3.0272       0.7011       2.0000      -0.5582      -0.0000   2
       5       0.4603      -0.8219      -0.4904       0.7414      -0.4814       0.7273       2.0000      -0.1902       0.0000   2
       6       0.4603      -0.8219      -0.4904       0.7414      -0.4814       0.7273       2.0000      -0.1902      -0.0000   2

Here column four is obtained by a linearization of the self-energy around the Kohn-Sham energies (second column) and can be compared to the third column of single-shot GW calculations on the real axis. Column six represents another set of QP-energies that is obtained from the roots of the following equation

These roots represent the poles of the Green's function in the spectral representation.

Optional: RPA Forces

Optionally, RPA forces can be calculated by adding following line to the INCAR:

 LRPAFORCE = .TRUE. 

After the QP-energies, VASP performs a linear-response calculation that is required for the RPA forces.[10] Following data block in the OUTCAR file can be found after a successful run:

POSITION                                       TOTAL RPA FORCE (eV/Angst)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     0.17542     -0.22348      0.17542        -0.292069      7.581315     -0.292069
     1.12850      1.31044      1.12850         0.304683     -7.605527      0.304683
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   total drift:                                0.012614     -0.024212      0.012614

SUGGESTED UPDATED POSCAR (direct coordinates)  step
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 -0.00958461  -0.00958461   0.13485779         0.04179056   0.04179056   0.00283088
  0.25787833   0.25787833   0.22191754        -0.04337198  -0.04337198   0.00431513
Warning: Currently RPA forces for metallic systems are not supported.

Partially self-consistent GW calculations: GW0R

The space-time implementation allows for true self-consistent GW calculations. That is, the solution of the Dyson equation for the Green's function can be obtained with a modest computational effort. The main procedure of a self-consistent GW calculation consists of four main steps

  • Obtain Green's function
  • Compute irreducible polarizability
  • Determine screened potential
  • Calculate GW self-energy

This procedure can be selected with the following INCAR settings

System = SiC
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
LOPTICS = .TRUE. ; LPEAD = .TRUE.  
NELMGW = number of iterations wanted ! NELM in 6.2 and older
ALGO = GW0R ! ALGO = scGW0R has the same effect here, that is self-consistency in G, no update in W
 

The number of self-consistency steps can be set with the NELM tag.

Due to efficiency, VASP performs each step in the Hartree-Fock basis. This is the reason why there are two sets of QP-energies found after the first iteration (one for the QP-energies in the KS-basis and one for the QP energies in the HF basis) After the second iteration, only the QP energies obtained in the HF basis are printed, and a similar output as follows is found in the OUTCAR file

QP shifts evaluated in HF basis
k-point   1 :       0.0000    0.0000    0.0000
band No.  KS-energies   sigma(KS)    QP-e(linear)    Z         QP-e(zeros)     Z        occupation    Imag(E_QP)    QP_DIFF TAG

     1      -7.1626      -8.6510      -8.2275       0.7154      -8.2173       0.7017       2.0000      -1.3177       0.0000   2
     2      -2.0899      -3.4157      -3.0348       0.7127      -3.0269       0.7008       2.0000      -0.5614       0.0000   2
     3      -2.0899      -3.4157      -3.0348       0.7127      -3.0269       0.7008       2.0000      -0.5614      -0.0000   2
     4      -2.0899      -3.4157      -3.0348       0.7127      -3.0269       0.7008       2.0000      -0.5614       0.0000   2
     5       0.4604      -0.8170      -0.4857       0.7407      -0.4768       0.7266       2.0000      -0.1945       0.0000   2
     6       0.4604      -0.8170      -0.4857       0.7407      -0.4768       0.7266       2.0000      -0.1945      -0.0000   2
     7       0.4604      -0.8170      -0.4857       0.7407      -0.4768       0.7266       2.0000      -0.1945       0.0000   2
     8       5.1013       4.0069       4.2594       0.7693       4.2645       0.7598       2.0000      -0.0602       0.0000   2

Here the meaning of each column is the same as for the other low-scaling GW algorithms.

Fully self-consistent GW caluclations: GWR

If the screened potential should be updated during the self-consistency circle [11] the following INCAR file can be used

System = SiC
ISMEAR = 0 ; SIGMA = 0.05
LOPTICS = .TRUE. ; LPEAD = .TRUE.  
NELMGW = number of iterations wanted ! use NELM in VASP.6.2 and older
ALGO = GWR ! ALGO = scGWR has the same effect here, that is self-consistency in G and W

The output is similar to partially self-consistent GW calculations, with the difference that KS-energies are replaced by the QP energies from previous iteration.

Caveats

Using this option, similar caveats can be expected as for ALGO=EVGW and QPGW calculations and we recommend to leave out the LOPTICS and LPEAD line for metals. Memory requirements of low-scaling GW and RPA algorithms

Related tags and articles

Examples that use this tag

References