Coulomb singularity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the HF exchange, the Coulomb operator <math>s</math> in reciprocal space | |||
:<math>V(G)=\frac{4\pi e^2}{G^2}</math> | :<math>V(G)=\frac{4\pi e^2}{G^2}</math> | ||
diverges for small G vectors. | diverges for small G vectors. | ||
To alleviate this issue and improve the convergence of the exact exchange integral with respect to supercell size (or k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods{{cite|gygi:prb:86}}, probe-charge Ewald {{cite|massidda:prb:93}} ({{TAG|HFALPHA}}), and Coulomb truncation methods{{cite|spenceralavi:prb:08}} ({{TAG|HFRCUT}}). | To alleviate this issue and improve the convergence of the exact exchange integral with respect to supercell size (or k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods{{cite|gygi:prb:86}}, probe-charge Ewald {{cite|massidda:prb:93}} ({{TAG|HFALPHA}}), and Coulomb truncation methods{{cite|spenceralavi:prb:08}} ({{TAG|HFRCUT}}). | ||
These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel within the limit of large supercell sizes. | These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel within the limit of large supercell sizes. |
Revision as of 08:51, 10 May 2022
In the HF exchange, the Coulomb operator in reciprocal space
diverges for small G vectors. To alleviate this issue and improve the convergence of the exact exchange integral with respect to supercell size (or k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods[1], probe-charge Ewald [2] (HFALPHA), and Coulomb truncation methods[3] (HFRCUT). These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel within the limit of large supercell sizes.