Category:NMR: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Spin_energy_split_new_colours.png|300px|thumb|Energy ''E'' against the magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' showing how the energy difference ''&Delta;E'' (red) between the spin up and down electrons changes with increasing magnetic field strength. This results in a slight difference in population between the up (purple) and down (green) states, the lower energy down state that is aligned with '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' being more populated according to the Boltzmann distribution.]]
'''Nuclear magnetic resonance''' (NMR) spectroscopy is a highly sensitive technique for probing the atomic-scale structure of molecules, liquids, and solids. However, directly extracting structural information from NMR spectra is often challenging. Consequently, ''ab-initio'' quantum mechanical simulations, such as those performed using VASP, play a crucial role in accurately linking NMR spectra to atomic-scale structural properties.
Many nuclei have an inherent, non-zero spin '''I''' and therefore a magnetic dipole moment '''&mu;''', conventionally taken along the z-axis:


:<math>
This page presents an overview of nuclear-electron interactions that can be computed and are relevant to interpret NMR spectra.
\mu_z = \gamma \textbf{I}_z
</math>


In the absence of a magnetic field, the up and down states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' is applied, the energy difference between two states is given by the following equation:
==Chemical shielding==
 
:<math>
\Delta E = \gamma \hbar \textbf{B}_{ext}
</math>
 
Conventionally, the z-axis is chosen for the direction of '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''. Along this axis, '''&mu;''' aligned with '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' will be slightly more energetically favorable and so more populated than '''&mu;''' aligned against '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''. This is only significant in the presence of strong magnetic fields.


In the presence of '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'', '''&mu;''' precesses at its Larmor frequency ''&omega;<sub>L</sub>'', determined by the strength of the magnetic field and the nucleus' gyromagnetic ratio ''&gamma;'':
[[File:Chemical_shielding.png|200px|thumb|The external magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These NMR response currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>in</sub>'' (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''.]] The effective B-field felt by a nucleus with finite nuclear spin is related to the applied B field via the chemical shielding tensor. The applied B-field induces a para- and diamagnetic NMR response current in the electrons and screens the nucleus with an induced B-field that follows from the Biot-Savart law, c.f. figure. The chemical shift is the difference in chemical shielding &sigma; relative to a reference &sigma;<sub>ref</sub>.


:<math>
:<math>
\omega_L = \gamma \textbf{B}_{ext}
\delta_{ij} = \sigma_{ij}^{\mathrm{ref}} - \sigma_{ij}.
</math>
</math>  
 
A weak, oscillating magnetic field applied perpendicular (i.e. in the ''transverse frame'') to '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' (''reference frame''), e.g. using a radio-frequency (RF) pulse at frequency ''&omega;<sub>rf</sub>'', can cause '''&mu;''' to oscillate with the RF. If ''&omega;<sub>rf</sub>'' is similar to ''&omega;<sub>L</sub>'', then resonance occurs, hence nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). '''&mu;''' flips from the reference to the transverse frame and the relaxation of '''&mu;''' back to the reference frame creates a signal that is measured in NMR {{Cite|laws:bitter:jerschow:2002}}{{Cite|reif:ashbrook:emsley:hong:2021}}.
 
==Chemical shielding==
[[File:Chemical_shielding.png|300px|thumb|The external magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>in</sub>'' (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''.]]
Each nuclear isotope has a different gyromagnetic ratio. Even for different atoms of the same isotope, the frequency can subtly differ based on the chemical environment. Electrons are also charged and so their movement in atoms, i.e. the electron current, generates a magnetic field opposed to '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''. This induced magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>in</sub>'' reduces the magnetic field at the nucleus, decreasing the frequency measured in NMR. In this way, the electrons ''shield'' the nucleus from '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''. Since the electron density of a molecule or crystal is determined by its molecular orbitals, its chemical environment can be probed by these subtle differences in measured frequency. This shielding relation between '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' and '''B'''''<sub>in</sub>'' is described by the ''chemical shielding'' tensor ''&sigma;<sub>ij</sub>'':
 
<math>\textbf{B}_{in}(\textbf{R}) = -\sigma(\textbf{R}) \textbf{B}_{ext}</math>
 
The absolute chemical shielding itself cannot be measured in experiment, instead, it must be taken relative to a standard reference {{Cite|harris:pac:2008}}, which is also known as the ''chemical shift'' ''&delta;<sub>ij</sub>'':
 
<math>
\delta_{ij}(\mathbf{R}) = \sigma_{ij}^{\mathrm{ref}} - \sigma_{ij}(\mathbf{R})
</math>


where ''i'' and ''j'' are Cartesian axes.
VASP can efficiently compute electronic properties in bulk systems thanks to the [[projector-augmented wave]] (PAW) method which takes advantage of [[pseudopotentials]] and a [[:Category:Pseudopotentials#Theory|frozen core approximation]]. However, the [[PAW formalism|standard PAW transformation]] does not fully account for how the gauge field <math>A</math> interacts with the reconstructed wavefunctions in the augmentation regions (near atomic cores). Thus, NMR calculations ({{TAGO|LCHIMAG|True}}) are based on an extended version of the [[PAW method]], the gauge-invariant PAW (GIPAW) method{{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}} that properly ensures the gauge invariance. The NMR currents ({{TAG|WRT_NMRCUR}}) are computed using linear response theory.


The chemical shift  (in ppm) is measurable and is related to the measured frequency ''&omega;<sub>sample</sub>'' via the following equation:
* Learn [[Calculating the chemical shieldings|how to calculate the chemical shielding]].
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


<math>
=== Nuclear-independent chemical shielding ===
\delta = \frac{\omega_{ref} - \omega_{sample}}{\omega_{sample}} \times 10^6
Nuclear-independent chemical shielding (NICS) is a computational method used to quantify aromaticity in molecules by calculating the magnetic shielding at a virtual point (not at a nucleus) in space, typically at the center of a ring or above it. See {{TAG|NUCIND}} for more information.
</math>
 
The chemical shielding tensor may be calculated by means of linear response using {{TAG|LCHIMAG}} {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}:
 
<math>
\sigma_{ij}(\textbf{R}) = - \frac{\partial B^{\mathrm{in}}_i(\mathbf{R})}{\partial B^{\mathrm{ext}}_j}
</math>
 
{{TAG|LCHIMAG}} calculates the chemical shieldings. These are for individual atoms and exclude the contribution due to the augmentation currents in other PAW spheres. If two-center terms are important, e.g. for H, then they should be included using {{TAG|LLRAUG}} {{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2013}}{{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2021}}.


==Magnetic susceptibility==
==Magnetic susceptibility==
The magnetic susceptibility <math>\chi</math> is the degree of magnetization '''M''' of a material in response to an applied magnetic field '''H'''. It is a bulk property, in contrast to the chemical shielding, which is for each nucleus.
The macroscopic magnetic susceptibility <math>\chi</math> is defined by {{Cite|mauri:louie:1996}}


:<math>
:<math>
\textbf{M} = \chi_v \textbf{H}
\textbf{B}_{\textrm{in}}^{(1)}(\textbf{G}=0) = \frac{8 \pi}{3} \chi \textbf{B}_{ext},
</math>
</math>


where <math>\chi_v</math> is the volume magnetic susceptibility.
where <math>\textbf{B}_{ext}</math> is the external magnetic field and <math>\textbf{B}_{\textrm{in}}^{(1)}</math> is the induced magnetic field. This must be taken into account for the chemical shielding as a G=0 contribution.
 
Alternatively, it can be expressed in terms of the induced magnetic field '''B''':
 
:<math>
\textbf{B} = \mu_0 (1+\chi_v) \textbf{H}
</math>


Like the chemical shielding, the magnetic susceptibility is calculated by linear response using {{TAG|LCHIMAG}} {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}, so they will both be shown in the same {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file.
It is calculated within linear response theory ({{TAGO|LCHIMAG|True}}), where a key variable ''Q<sub>ij</sub>'' is approximated in two ways. The so-called ''pGv'' approximation is used by default {{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}, where ''p'' is momentum, ''v'' is velocity, and ''G'' is a Green's function. An alternative approach, the ''vGv'' approximation is available to calculate the susceptibility {{Cite|avezac:prb:2007}}. See {{TAG|LVGVCALC}} and {{TAG|LVGVAPPL}} to control the approximation.  


* Learn [[Calculating the magnetic susceptibility|how to perform a magnetic susceptibility calculation.]]
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
==Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient==
==Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient==
[[File:Quadrupolar_efg.png|300px|thumb|The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient ''V'' in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)]]
[[File:Quadrupolar_efg.png|250px|thumb|The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient ''V'' in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)]]
Nuclei with '''I''' > &#177; &frac12; have an electronic quadrupolar moment. This means that, at the nucleus, there is a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) ''V<sub>ij</sub>'', i.e. the rate of change of the electric field with respect to position is non-zero:
Nuclei with '''I''' > &#177; &frac12; have a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) and an electronic quadrupolar moment. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical environment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) {{Cite|nqr:web}} (sometimes called zero-field NMR spectroscopy). The EFG is the second derivative of the potential <math>V</math>:


<math>
:<math>
V_{ij} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}
V_{ij} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}
</math>
</math>,


where ''V'' is the electrostatic potential generated by the charge distribution of electrons and nuclei.
which is a sum of three parts along the Cartesian ''i'',''j'' axes:


''V<sub>ij</sub>'' comes from the quadrupolar nuclei, which are non-spherical and therefore generate a non-uniform electric charge distribution. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical enviornment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) {{Cite|nqr:web}}. The EFG is not directly measurable but the nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant ''C<sub>q</sub>'' is, defined as:
:<math>
V_{i,j} = \tilde{V}_{i,j} -\tilde{V}_{i,j}^1 + V_{i,j}^1
</math>


<math>
where <math>\tilde{V}_{i,j}</math> is the plane-wave part of the AE potential, <math>\tilde{V}_{i,j}^1</math> is the one-center expansion of the pseudopotential method, and <math>V_{i,j}^1</math> is the one-center expansion of the AE potential.
C_q = \frac{eQV_{zz}}{h}
</math>


where ''e'' is the charge of an electron, ''Q'' is the isotope-specific quadrupole moment, and ''h'' is the Planck constant.
In VASP, the EFG is calculated using the {{TAG|LEFG}} tag. The commonly reported nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant ''C<sub>q</sub>'' is then printed using isotope-specific quadrupole moment defined using {{TAG|QUAD_EFG}} {{Cite|petrilli:prb:1998}}.  


The EFG can be calculated using {{TAG|LEFG}} {{Cite|petrilli:prb:1998}}, which also calculates ''C<sub>q</sub>'' so long as ''Q'' are defined using {{TAG|QUAD_EFG}}.
* Learn [[Calculating the electric field gradient|how to perform an electric field gradient calculation]].
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


==Hyperfine coupling==
==Hyperfine coupling==
[[File:Hyperfine_coupling.png|300px|thumb|Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.]]
[[File:Hyperfine_coupling.png|250px|thumb|Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.]]
As well as the nuclei, electrons also have spin. Analogously to the nuclei, unpaired electrons can interact with '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' to provide information about their environment. The interaction between the electron's magnetic moment and the magnetic dipole moment of the nucleus (i.e. electron spin-nuclear spin interaction) split otherwise degenerate energy levels. This splitting is known as hyperfine splitting.
The hyperfine tensor <math>A^I</math> describes the interaction between a nuclear spin <math>S^I</math> and the electronic spin distribution <math>S^e</math>. In most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state measureable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) {{Cite|weil:bolton:2007}}:


In most stable systems, all electrons are paired together, spin-up and spin-down, resulting in overall no spin. If a system has unpaired electrons, e.g. radicals, metal oxides, defects, then these unpaired electrons can be used to investigate these unusual systems, e.g. using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) {{Cite|weil:bolton:2007}}.  
:<math>
E=\sum_{ij} S^e_i A^I_{ij} S^I_j.
</math>


The hyperfine tensor ''A<sup>I</sup>'' describes the interaction between a nuclear spin ''S<sup>I</sup>'' and the electronic spin distribution ''S<sup>e</sup>'' (in most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state):
The hyperfine tensor is split into two terms, isotropic (or Fermi contact) <math>A^I_{iso}</math> and anisotropic (or dipolar contributions) <math>A^I_{ani}</math>:


:<math>
:<math>
E=\sum_{ij} S^e_i A^I_{ij} S^I_j
A^I_{i,j} = (A^I_{iso})_{i,j} + (A^I_{ani})_{i,j}.
</math>
</math>


The hyperfine tensor can be calculated using {{TAG|LHYPERFINE}} {{Cite|szasz:prb:2013}}.
<math>A^I_{iso}</math> is calculated based on the spin-density{{Cite|szasz:prb:2013}} and <math>A^I_{ani}</math> is calculated based on the dipolar-dipolar contribution terms <math>W_{i,j}(\textbf{R})</math>. The hyperfine tensor calculation itself is defined using {{TAGO|LHYPERFINE|True}}. Both the Fermi contact and dipolar contribution terms are related to the nuclear gyromagnetic moment &gamma;, which are controlled by setting {{TAG|NGYROMAG}}.


== How to ==
* Learn [[Calculating the hyperfine coupling constant|how to perform a hyperfine coupling calculation.]]
*Chemical shift tensors: {{TAG|LCHIMAG}}.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
*Electric field gradient tensors. The main tags are:
**{{TAG|LEFG}} to switch on the field gradient tensor calculation,
**{{TAG|QUAD_EFG}} to specify the input nuclear quadrupole moments.
*Hyperfine tensors: {{TAG|LHYPERFINE}}.


==References==
==References==


[[Category:Linear response]]
[[Category:Linear response]][[Category:Magnetism]]

Latest revision as of 11:35, 10 March 2025

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a highly sensitive technique for probing the atomic-scale structure of molecules, liquids, and solids. However, directly extracting structural information from NMR spectra is often challenging. Consequently, ab-initio quantum mechanical simulations, such as those performed using VASP, play a crucial role in accurately linking NMR spectra to atomic-scale structural properties.

This page presents an overview of nuclear-electron interactions that can be computed and are relevant to interpret NMR spectra.

Chemical shielding

The external magnetic field Bext (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These NMR response currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field Bin (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from Bext.

The effective B-field felt by a nucleus with finite nuclear spin is related to the applied B field via the chemical shielding tensor. The applied B-field induces a para- and diamagnetic NMR response current in the electrons and screens the nucleus with an induced B-field that follows from the Biot-Savart law, c.f. figure. The chemical shift is the difference in chemical shielding σ relative to a reference σref.

VASP can efficiently compute electronic properties in bulk systems thanks to the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method which takes advantage of pseudopotentials and a frozen core approximation. However, the standard PAW transformation does not fully account for how the gauge field interacts with the reconstructed wavefunctions in the augmentation regions (near atomic cores). Thus, NMR calculations (LCHIMAG = True) are based on an extended version of the PAW method, the gauge-invariant PAW (GIPAW) method[1][2] that properly ensures the gauge invariance. The NMR currents (WRT_NMRCUR) are computed using linear response theory.

Nuclear-independent chemical shielding

Nuclear-independent chemical shielding (NICS) is a computational method used to quantify aromaticity in molecules by calculating the magnetic shielding at a virtual point (not at a nucleus) in space, typically at the center of a ring or above it. See NUCIND for more information.

Magnetic susceptibility

The macroscopic magnetic susceptibility is defined by [3]

where is the external magnetic field and is the induced magnetic field. This must be taken into account for the chemical shielding as a G=0 contribution.

It is calculated within linear response theory (LCHIMAG = True), where a key variable Qij is approximated in two ways. The so-called pGv approximation is used by default [2], where p is momentum, v is velocity, and G is a Green's function. An alternative approach, the vGv approximation is available to calculate the susceptibility [4]. See LVGVCALC and LVGVAPPL to control the approximation.

Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient

The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient V in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)

Nuclei with I > ± ½ have a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) and an electronic quadrupolar moment. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical environment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) [5] (sometimes called zero-field NMR spectroscopy). The EFG is the second derivative of the potential :

,

which is a sum of three parts along the Cartesian i,j axes:

where is the plane-wave part of the AE potential, is the one-center expansion of the pseudopotential method, and is the one-center expansion of the AE potential.

In VASP, the EFG is calculated using the LEFG tag. The commonly reported nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant Cq is then printed using isotope-specific quadrupole moment defined using QUAD_EFG [6].

Hyperfine coupling

Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.

The hyperfine tensor describes the interaction between a nuclear spin and the electronic spin distribution . In most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state measureable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [7]:

The hyperfine tensor is split into two terms, isotropic (or Fermi contact) and anisotropic (or dipolar contributions) :

is calculated based on the spin-density[8] and is calculated based on the dipolar-dipolar contribution terms . The hyperfine tensor calculation itself is defined using LHYPERFINE = True. Both the Fermi contact and dipolar contribution terms are related to the nuclear gyromagnetic moment γ, which are controlled by setting NGYROMAG.

References

Subcategories

This category has only the following subcategory.

Pages in category "NMR"

The following 14 pages are in this category, out of 14 total.