Category:NMR: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
 
(36 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Spin_energy_split_new_colours.png|340px|thumb|Fig 1. Energy ''E'' against the magnetic field '''B''' showing how the energy difference ''ΔE'' (red) between the spin up and down electrons changes with increasing magnetic field strength. This results in a slight difference in population between the up (purple) and down (green) states, the lower energy down state that is aligned with '''B''' being more populated according to the Boltzmann distribution.]]
[[File:Spin_energy_split_new_colours.png|300px|thumb|Energy ''E'' against the magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' showing how the energy difference ''&Delta;E'' (red) between the spin up and down electrons changes with increasing magnetic field strength. This results in a slight difference in population between the up (purple) and down (green) states, the lower energy down state that is aligned with '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' being more populated according to the Boltzmann distribution.]]
Many nuclei have an inherent, non-zero spin '''I''' and therefore a magnetic dipole moment '''&mu;''', conventionally along the z-axis:
Density-functional theory (DFT) can be used to calculate various nuclear properties of a crystal measurable through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and associated methods. In the Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) approach, a frozen core approximation is used. The Kohn-Sham (KS) states near the nucleus are correctly described using all-electron (AE) partial waves.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
==Chemical shielding==
[[File:Chemical_shielding.png|300px|thumb|The external magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>'' (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field '''B'''''<sub>in</sub>'' (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from '''B'''''<sub>ext</sub>''.]]
The chemical shift &delta; is a property that describes the shielding of an applied, external magnetic field '''B''' felt by a nucleus with non-zero spin. The chemical shift is the difference in chemical shielding &sigma; relative to a reference &sigma;<sub>ref</sub>.


:<math>
:<math>
\mu_z = \gamma \textbf{I}_z
\delta_{ij} = \sigma_{ij}^{\mathrm{ref}} - \sigma_{ij}
</math>
</math>


In the absence of a magnetic field, these are degenerate states. When an external magnetic field '''B'''<sub>ext</sub> is applied, the energy difference between two states is given by the following equation:
The chemical shielding tensor can be calculated using the Gauge-Including PAW (GIPAW) method, using the {{TAG|LCHIMAG}} tag {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}. The chemical shielding is calculated via the induced current (cf. {{TAG|WRT_NMRCUR}}) {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}} and has contributions from the plane-wave grid and one-center contributions (the induced field at the center of a PAW sphere due to the augmentation current inside that sphere). These are for individual atoms and exclude the contribution due to the augmentation currents in other PAW spheres. If two-center terms are important, e.g. for H, then they should be included using {{TAG|LLRAUG}} {{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2013}}{{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2021}}.
 
:<math>
\Delta E = \gamma \hbar \textbf{B}_{ext}
</math>


Conventionally, the z-axis is chosen for the direction of '''B'''<sub>ext</sub>. Along this axis, '''&mu;''' aligned with '''B'''<sub>ext</sub> will be slightly more energetically favorable and so more populated than '''&mu;''' opposed to '''B'''<sub>ext</sub>. This is only significant in the presence of strong magnetic fields.
<!--Learn [[insert|how to perform a chemical shielding calculation.]]-->
 
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
In the presence of '''B'''<sub>ext</sub>, '''&mu;''' precesses at its Larmor frequency ''&omega;''<sub>L</sub>, determined by the strength of the magnetic field and the nucleus' gyromagnetic ratio ''&gamma;'':
==Magnetic susceptibility==
The macroscopic magnetic susceptibility <math>\chi</math> is the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field {{Cite|mauri:louie:1996}}.


:<math>
:<math>
\omega_L = \gamma \textbf{B}
\textbf{B}_{\textrm{in}}^{(1)}(\textbf{G}=0) = \frac{8 \pi}{3} \chi \textbf{B}
</math>
</math>


A weak, oscillating magnetic field applied perpendicular (i.e. in the ''transverse frame'') to '''B'''<sub>ext</sub> (''reference frame''), e.g. using a radio-frequency (RF) pulse at frequency ''&omega;''<sub>rf</sub>, can cause '''&mu;''' to oscillate with the RF. If ''&omega;''<sub>rf</sub> is similar to ''&omega;''<sub>L</sub>, then resonance occurs, hence nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). '''&mu;''' flips from the reference to the transverse frame and the relaxation of '''&mu;''' back to the reference frame creates a signal that is measured in NMR {{Cite|laws:bitter:jerschow:2002}}{{Cite|reif:ashbrook:emsley:hong:2021}}.
where <math>\textbf{B}</math> is the external magnetic field and <math>\textbf{B}_{\textrm{in}}^{(1)}</math> is the induced magnetic field.


==Chemical shielding==
The orbital magnetic susceptibility is calculated via a finite-differences approach, where a key variable ''Q<sub>ij</sub>'' is approximated in two ways. The so-called ''pGv''-approximation is used by default {{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}, where ''p'' is momentum, ''v'' is velocity, and ''G'' is a Green's function. An alternative approach, the ''vGv''-approximation is available to calculate the susceptibility {{Cite|avezac:prb:2007}}, which can be switched off using {{TAG|LVGVCALC}}. With {{TAG|LVGVAPPL}} one can force VASP to use the ''vGv'' result for the <math>\mathbf{G=0}</math> contribution instead of the ''pGv'' used as default. With {{TAG|LVGVCALC}} one can suppress the calculation of the ''vGv'' magnetic susceptibility.


Each nuclear isotope has a different gyromagnetic ratio. Even with the same isotope, the frequency can subtly differ based on the chemical environment. Electrons are also charged and so their movement in atoms, i.e. the electronic current, generates a magnetic field opposed to '''B'''<sub>ext</sub>. This induced magnetic field '''B'''<sub>ind</sub> reduces the magnetic field at the nucleus, decreasing the frequency measured in NMR. In this way, the electrons ''shield'' the nucleus from '''B'''<sub>ext</sub>. Since the electron density of a molecule or crystal is determined by its molecular orbitals, its chemical environment can be probed by these subtle differences in frequency. This shielding relation between '''B'''<sub>ext</sub> and '''B'''<sub>ind</sub> is described by the ''chemical shielding'' tensor ''&sigma;''<sub>ij</sub>:
Like the chemical shielding, the magnetic susceptibility is calculated by linear response using {{TAG|LCHIMAG}} {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}, so they will both be shown in the same {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file.


<math>\textbf{B}_{ind}(\textbf{R}) = -\sigma(\textbf{R}) \textbf{B}_{ext}</math>
<!--Learn [[insert|how to perform a magnetic susceptibility calculation.]]-->
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
==Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient==
[[File:Quadrupolar_efg.png|300px|thumb|The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient ''V'' in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)]]
Nuclei with '''I''' > &#177; &frac12; have a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) and an electronic quadrupolar moment. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical enviornment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) {{Cite|nqr:web}}. The all-electron (AE) nature of the PAW approach makes it particularly suitable for calculating the EFG. The EFG is the second derivative of the potential <math>V</math>:


The chemical shielding itself cannot be measured in experiment, instead, it must be taken relative to a standard reference {{Cite|harris:pac:2008}}, which results in the ''chemical shift'' ''&delta;''<sub>ij</sub>:
:<math>
V_{ij} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}
</math>,


<math>
which is a sum of three parts along the Cartesian ''i'',''j'' axes:
\delta_{ij}(\mathbf{R}) = \sigma_{ij}^{\mathrm{ref}} - \sigma_{ij}(\mathbf{R})
</math>


where ''i'' and ''j'' are Cartesian axes.
:<math>
 
V_{i,j} = \tilde{V}_{i,j} -\tilde{V}_{i,j}^1 + V_{i,j}^1
The chemical shift  (in ppm) is measurable and is related to the measured frequency ''&omega;''<sub>sample</sub> via the following equation:
 
<math>
\delta = \frac{\omega_{ref} - \omega_{sample}}{\omega_{sample}} \times 10^6
</math>
</math>


The chemical shielding tensor may be calculated by means of linear response using {{TAG|LCHIMAG}} {{Cite|pickard:prb:2001}}{{Cite|yates:prb:2007}}:
where <math>\tilde{V}_{i,j}</math> is the plane-wave part of the AE potential, <math>\tilde{V}_{i,j}^1</math> is the one-cener expansion of the pseudopotential method, and <math>V_{i,j}^1</math> is the one-center expansion of the AE potential.


<math>
In VASP, the EFG is calculated using the {{TAG|LEFG}} tag. The commonly reported nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant ''C<sub>q</sub>'' is then printed using isotope-specific quadrupole moment defined using {{TAG|QUAD_EFG}} {{Cite|petrilli:prb:1998}}.
\sigma_{ij}(\textbf{R}) = - \frac{\partial B^{\mathrm{ind}}_i(\mathbf{R})}{\partial B^{\mathrm{ext}}_j}
</math>


{{TAG|LCHIMAG}} calculates the chemical shieldings. These are for individual atoms and exclude the contribution due to the augmentation currents in other PAW spheres. If two-center terms are important, e.g. for H, then they may be included using {{TAG|LLRAUG}} {{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2017}}{{Cite|dewijs:jcp:2018}}.
<!--Learn [[insert|how to perform an electric field gradient calculation.]]-->
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


==Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient==
==Hyperfine coupling==
Nuclei with '''I''' > &#177; &frac12; have an electronic quadrupolar moment. This means that, at the nucleus, there is a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG), i.e. the rate of change of the electric field with respect to position:
[[File:Hyperfine_coupling.png|300px|thumb|Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.]]
The hyperfine tensor <math>A^I</math> describes the interaction between a nuclear spin <math>S^I</math> and the electronic spin distribution <math>S^e</math> (in most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state measureable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) {{Cite|weil:bolton:2007}}):


<math>
:<math>
V_{ij} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}
E=\sum_{ij} S^e_i A^I_{ij} S^I_j
</math>
</math>.


This comes from the quadrupolar nuclei being non-spherical and having a non-uniform electric charge distribution. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical enviornment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) {{Cite|nqr:web}}. The EFG is not directly measurable but the nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant ''C<sub>q</sub>'' is, defined as:
The hyperfine tensor is split into two terms, isotropic (or Fermi contact) <math>A^I_{iso}</math> and anisotropic (or dipolar contributions) <math>A^I_{ani}</math>:


<math>
:<math>
C_q = \frac{eQV_{zz}}{h}
A^I_{i,j} = (A^I_{iso})_{i,j} + (A^I_{ani})_{i,j}
</math>
</math>.


where ''e'' is the charge of an electron, ''Q'' is the isotope-specific quadrupole moment, and ''h'' is the Planck constant.
Within the PAW approach, <math>A^I_{iso}</math> is calculated from the spin-density <math>\sigma</math>, which is split into three terms, the pseudo-spin-density <math>\tilde{\sigma}</math>, and the one-center expansions of the true- and pseudo-spin density, <math>\sigma^1</math> and <math>\tilde{\sigma}^1</math>, respectively {{Cite|szasz:prb:2013}}:


The EFG can be calculated using {{TAG|LEFG}} {{Cite|petrilli:prb:1998}}, which also calculates ''C<sub>q</sub>'' so long as ''Q'' are defined using {{TAG|QUAD_EFG}}.
:<math>
 
\sigma = \tilde{\sigma} + \sigma^1 - \tilde{\sigma}^1
==Hyperfine coupling==
</math>.
As well as the nuclei, electrons also have spin. Analogously to the nuclei, this may couple with '''B'''<sub>ext</sub> to provide information about its environment. The interaction between internally generated magnetic fields and the magnetic dipole moment of the nucleus split otherwise degenerate energy levels. This splitting is known as hyperfine splitting.  


In most stable systems, all electrons are paired together, spin-up and spin-down, resulting in overall no spin. If a system has unpaired electrons, e.g. radicals, metal oxides, defects, then these systems can be investigated, e.g. using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) {{Cite|weil:bolton:2007}}.
<math>A^I_{ani}</math> is calculated from the equivalent three dipolar-dipolar contribution terms <math>W_{i,j}(\textbf{R})</math>, which are each derived from their corresponding true- or pseudo-spin densities:
 
The hyperfine tensor ''A<sup>I</sup>'' describes the interaction between a nuclear spin ''S<sup>I</sup>'' and the electronic spin distribution ''S<sup>e</sup>'' (in most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state):


:<math>
:<math>
E=\sum_{ij} S^e_i A^I_{ij} S^I_j
W_{i,j}(\textbf{R}) = \tilde{W}_{i,j}(\textbf{R}) + W_{i,j}^1(\textbf{R}) - \tilde{W}_{i,j}^1(\textbf{R})
</math>
</math>


The hyperfine tensor can be calculated using {{TAG|LHYPERFINE}} {{Cite|szasz:prb:2013}}.
Both the Fermi contact and dipolar contribution terms are related to the nuclear gyromagnetic moment &gamma;, which are defined in {{TAG|NGYROMAG}}. The hyperfine tensor calculation itself is defined using {{TAG|LHYPERFINE}}.  


== How to ==
<!--Learn [[insert|how to perform a hyperfine coupling calculation.]]-->
*Chemical shift tensors: {{TAG|LCHIMAG}}.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
*Electric field gradient tensors: {{TAG|Electric Field Gradient}}. The main tags are:
**{{TAG|LEFG}} to switch on the field gradient tensor calculation,
**{{TAG|QUAD_EFG}} to specify the input nuclear quadrupole moments.
*Hyperfine tensors: {{TAG|LHYPERFINE}}.


==References==
==References==


[[Category:Linear response]]
[[Category:Linear response]]

Latest revision as of 09:09, 8 March 2025

Energy E against the magnetic field Bext showing how the energy difference ΔE (red) between the spin up and down electrons changes with increasing magnetic field strength. This results in a slight difference in population between the up (purple) and down (green) states, the lower energy down state that is aligned with Bext being more populated according to the Boltzmann distribution.

Density-functional theory (DFT) can be used to calculate various nuclear properties of a crystal measurable through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and associated methods. In the Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) approach, a frozen core approximation is used. The Kohn-Sham (KS) states near the nucleus are correctly described using all-electron (AE) partial waves.

Chemical shielding

The external magnetic field Bext (purple) induces currents in the electrons in atoms. These currents (black arrows) in turn induce an opposing magnetic field Bin (red), reducing the magnetic field at the position of the nucleus, effectively shielding the nucleus from Bext.

The chemical shift δ is a property that describes the shielding of an applied, external magnetic field B felt by a nucleus with non-zero spin. The chemical shift is the difference in chemical shielding σ relative to a reference σref.

The chemical shielding tensor can be calculated using the Gauge-Including PAW (GIPAW) method, using the LCHIMAG tag [1][2]. The chemical shielding is calculated via the induced current (cf. WRT_NMRCUR) [1][2] and has contributions from the plane-wave grid and one-center contributions (the induced field at the center of a PAW sphere due to the augmentation current inside that sphere). These are for individual atoms and exclude the contribution due to the augmentation currents in other PAW spheres. If two-center terms are important, e.g. for H, then they should be included using LLRAUG [3][4].

Magnetic susceptibility

The macroscopic magnetic susceptibility is the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field [5].

where is the external magnetic field and is the induced magnetic field.

The orbital magnetic susceptibility is calculated via a finite-differences approach, where a key variable Qij is approximated in two ways. The so-called pGv-approximation is used by default [2], where p is momentum, v is velocity, and G is a Green's function. An alternative approach, the vGv-approximation is available to calculate the susceptibility [6], which can be switched off using LVGVCALC. With LVGVAPPL one can force VASP to use the vGv result for the contribution instead of the pGv used as default. With LVGVCALC one can suppress the calculation of the vGv magnetic susceptibility.

Like the chemical shielding, the magnetic susceptibility is calculated by linear response using LCHIMAG [1][2], so they will both be shown in the same OUTCAR file.

Quadrupolar nuclei - electric field gradient

The quadrupolar electric field of a nitrogen nucleus coupling to electric field gradient V in MAPbI3 (methyl ammonium lead (III) iodide)

Nuclei with I > ± ½ have a non-zero electric field gradient (EFG) and an electronic quadrupolar moment. The electric quadrupolar moment couples with the EFG and so the chemical enviornment of the nucleus may be probed using nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) [7]. The all-electron (AE) nature of the PAW approach makes it particularly suitable for calculating the EFG. The EFG is the second derivative of the potential :

,

which is a sum of three parts along the Cartesian i,j axes:

where is the plane-wave part of the AE potential, is the one-cener expansion of the pseudopotential method, and is the one-center expansion of the AE potential.

In VASP, the EFG is calculated using the LEFG tag. The commonly reported nuclear quadrupolar coupling constant Cq is then printed using isotope-specific quadrupole moment defined using QUAD_EFG [8].

Hyperfine coupling

Hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin of the unpaired electron at a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond.

The hyperfine tensor describes the interaction between a nuclear spin and the electronic spin distribution (in most cases associated with a paramagnetic defect state measureable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [9]):

.

The hyperfine tensor is split into two terms, isotropic (or Fermi contact) and anisotropic (or dipolar contributions) :

.

Within the PAW approach, is calculated from the spin-density , which is split into three terms, the pseudo-spin-density , and the one-center expansions of the true- and pseudo-spin density, and , respectively [10]:

.

is calculated from the equivalent three dipolar-dipolar contribution terms , which are each derived from their corresponding true- or pseudo-spin densities:

Both the Fermi contact and dipolar contribution terms are related to the nuclear gyromagnetic moment γ, which are defined in NGYROMAG. The hyperfine tensor calculation itself is defined using LHYPERFINE.

References

  1. a b c C. J. Pickard and F. Mauri, All-electron magnetic response with pseudopotentials: NMR chemical shifts, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245101 (2001).
  2. a b c d J. R. Yates, C. J. Pickard, and F. Mauri, Calculation of NMR chemical shifts for extended systems using ultrasoft pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 76, 024401 (2007).
  3. F. Vasconcelos, G.A. de Wijs, R. W. A. Havenith, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Finite-field implementation of NMR chemical shieldings for molecules: Direct and converse gauge-including projector-augmented-wave methods, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 014109 (2013).
  4. G.A. de Wijs, G. Kresse, R. W. A. Havenith, and M. Marsman, Comparing GIPAW with numerically exact chemical shieldings: The role of two-center contributions to the induced current, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 234101 (2021).
  5. F. Mauri, S. G. Louie, Magnetic Susceptibility of Insulators from First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4246 (1996).
  6. M. d'Avezac, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Spin and orbital magnetic response in metals: Susceptibility and NMR shifts, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165122 (2007).
  7. Nuclear quadrupole resonance, www.wikipedia.org (2025)
  8. H. M. Petrilli, P. E. Blöchl, P. Blaha, and K. Schwarz, Electric-field-gradient calculations using the projector augmented wave method, Phys. Rev. B 57, 14690 (1998).
  9. J. Weil and J. Bolton, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications, (2007).
  10. K. Szasz, T. Hornos, M. Marsman, and A. Gali, Hyperfine coupling of point defects in semiconductors by hybrid density functional calculations: The role of core spin polarization, Phys. Rev. B, 88, 075202 (2013).

Subcategories

This category has only the following subcategory.

Pages in category "NMR"

The following 14 pages are in this category, out of 14 total.